Scan first
Photograph the target and build a digital history from the same paper targets already used in training.
Product comparison
This page is for shooters comparing RangeLog with Club46 and deciding between logging, target scoring, and target-based analysis.
RangeLog is best understood as a shooting-log product focused on range-day, firearm, and ammunition logging. Club46 takes a different route by using target scanning as the starting point for analysis and improvement.
Use this page when deciding whether RangeLog fits your current routine better than Club46, especially when choosing between simple logging, target scoring, and scanning-based analysis.
Every product in this comparison solves a real problem. These are the areas where RangeLog appears strongest.
These differences matter when the goal is not only to save a range visit, but to understand shot patterns and improve precision.
Club46 starts with the paper target and turns it into useful training feedback through automatic hit detection, group analysis, progress history, and connected club features.
Photograph the target and build a digital history from the same paper targets already used in training.
Review dispersion, center offset, and consistency instead of relying only on final scores or handwritten notes.
Use the same data for individual practice, long-term progress, and private club comparisons.
RangeLog is the better fit when you mainly want a lightweight range log and do not need deep analysis from target photos.
Club46 is the better fit when target photos should become useful training data with automatic detection, group analysis, history, and club features in one system.
Try Club46 when target photos, group analysis, progress trends, and club-friendly tracking should live in the same system.